Energy Farm

Skip to content

OTHER POST CARBON INSTITUTE PROGRAMS:   Global Public Media   Oil Depletion Protocol   Relocalization Network   Post Carbon Cities   


Corn

Producing Chicken Feed On-site

Submitted by joshpuckett on Thu, 2008-04-03 13:48.

At the Sebastopol Energy Garden eggs account for a large portion of the calories that we produce. Of the estimated 1,476,765,3 calories that we can produce over the next growing year, 136,218 of that comes in the form of eggs.

On average our flock of five chickens produces an egg/chicken/day, each weighing roughly 61g, and containing 93.3 calories.

Supporting a flock of chickens; however, requires energy as well. Each chicken needs at least 200 calories/day to survive, and while about 30% of those calories can be obtained by foraging, the other 70% needs to be provided for them. Our chickens are allowed access to the compost piles and obtain some additional calories from the food scraps we recycle, but this is not enough.

Because hens allocate so much of the protein that they consume toward egg production it is also essential that we support the needs of our flock by providing a protein rich feed for them. It is recommended that 16% of a chicken's diet be protein.

Source Theoretical calorie yield (cal/egg) Theoretical yield (g/egg) Number of eggs/day eggs/year Total calorie yield/year

Chicken Eggs 93.3 61 5 1460 136,218

Recommended Daily Value (chicken): 200 cal/day (5 chickens) (365) = 365,000 cal/ year

FOOD SOURCE % PROTEIN, BY WT

Dried fish flakes 76
Dried liver 76
Dried earthworms 76
Duckweed 50
Torula yeast 50
Brewers yeast 39
Soybeans (dry roasted) 37
Flaxseed 37
Alfalfa seed 35
Beef, lean 28
Earthworms 28
Fish 28
Sunflower seeds 26.3
Wheat germ 25
Peas & Beans, dried 24.5
Sesame seed 19.3
Soybeans (boiled) 17
Wheat bran 16.6
Oats, whole 14
Rice polish 12.8
Rye 12.5
Wheat 12.5
Barley 12.3
Oats 12
Corn 9
Millet 9
Milo 9
Rice, brown 7.5

Chicken feed can be purchased from most feed stores and while this may be a simple enough solution for most, it is our goal to produce chicken feed on-site so that we may decrease our dependece upon off-site materials and reduce our energy consumption.

The majority of chicken feed is produced through unsustainable, agricultural methods which rely heavily upon the use of petroleum. The proces behind producing, storing, and transporting feed is a very energy requiring process; by producing chicken feed on-site, on a small scale, we can avoid a lot of the energy inputs of conventional production.

By calculating the theoretical calorie yield of each crop intended for chicken feed as well as their protein content, we can determine the amount of required growing space for feeding the chickens. When it comes time to harvest the grains, and process them we will already have calculated how much to allocate towards the chickens. Then all we need to do is grind the grains and mix them accordingly. In the batch that we just prepared we used a combination of Peredovik Sungflowers seeds, Sorghum, Millet, and Ground corn.

Hand powered Corona Mill

[video]

Corn Millet

Peredovik Sunflower Dale Sorghum

Chicken Feed

Kentucky State University Energy Farm Preliminary Study

Submitted by mkbomford on Fri, 2007-10-26 13:08.
Michael BomfordMy name is Michael Bomford. I work for the Community Research Service at Kentucky State University, an historically black land grant university in Frankfort, Kentucky's capitol city. My research focuses on developing sustainable organic agriculture systems suitable for adoption by small farmers. Check out some of the projects I'm working on here.

This summer my student, John Rodgers, conducted an energy farm experiment on organic land at the Kentucky State University Research and Demonstration farm.

Kentucky State University Research FarmOrganic land on the KSU research farm
Cultivated land on the Kentucky State University Research Farm (left),
includes 12 acres managed according to organic standards (right).
See a rollover image showing how the land is used.

We grew food and energy crops on either side of a solar-heated high tunnel used for year-round vegetable production without fossil fuel heat.

KSU food and energy crops
KSU energy farm project, with food crops (foreground),
high tunnel, and energy crops (background).

Our energy crops were sweet sorghum, sweet potato, corn, and Jerusalem artichoke. Each crop was grown in four plots, randomly assigned to locations throughout the energy garden.

Energy crops
John Rodgers manages plots of four potential energy crops:
1. Jerusalem artichoke (yellow flowers, foreground)
2. Sweet potato (vines, being cut)
3. Corn (dry stalks)
4. Sweet sorghum (tall canes, background)

We planted all of crops in early June, and harvested them in September and October. The corn harvest was easy: We picked ears off the stalks, then dried them and removed the kernals of corn.

The Jerusalem artichoke harvest was easy, too. A little effort with a spading fork brought up a tremendous mass of starchy nodules from each plant.

Jerusalem artichoke root mass
Jerusalem artichoke root mass.

Brian Geier with Jerusalem artichoke
Research Assistant Brian Geier holds a Jerusalem artichoke top in
one hand, and its root mass in the other.

The sweet potato harvest was more difficult. Hand harvest with a spading fork missed a lot of tubers. We recovered more tubers with a potato plow attachment for a walk-behind tractor.

Potato plow for walk-behind tractorPotato plow with walk-behind tractor
A potato plow (left) can be pulled by a walk-behind tractor (left), but requires the user to bear down heavily. The tool recovered more sweet potatoes than a spading fork, with very little crop damage, but required a lot of physical effort. Co-Investigator Tony Silvernail operates the tractor in this picture.

A 2.5 minute video about our sweet sorghum harvest is here.

Our initial analysis suggests that an area dedicated to sweet potato produces more than five times as much carbohydrate as the same area dedicated to corn. Since carbohydrates are the feedstock for fermentation, we expect sweet potato to produce five times more ethanol per unit area, too. Sweet sorghum was the runner up among the crops we grew, producing almost three times as much carbohydrate as corn.

We're fermenting subsamples from our harvest now, to see whether carbohydrate production translates into as much ethanol as we think it will.

John Rodgers will present our initial findings at the Kentucky Academy of Science meeting in early November.

John's study this year is a preliminary to a four-year study, beginning next season, to examine the effect of farm scale on energy, labor, and land use efficiency of food and energy crop production.

We will grow sweet sorghum, corn, sweet potato, and soybean at three different scales:
  1. 1. Biointensive - using human labor and hand tools in small beds, according to the methods of John Jeavons
  2. 2. Market garden - using no machinery larger than a walk-behind tractor in medium-sized beds
  3. 3. Small farm - using standard four-wheeled tractors for crop production at the field scale.
The study will be conducted in cooperation with the Post Carbon Institute Energy Farms network.


© 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Post Carbon Institute

The Local Energy Farms Network is an Initiative of Post Carbon Institute, a US 501(c)3 non-profit organization.